I had a nice weekend of silly drunkeness. Saturday was the last party with some of my friends here, before they go off to Europe. I’m leaving in a week myself, and thats a very strange feeling. I’ve had much fun here, and I will sure miss these Aussies..
I haven’t started on the script I’m supposed to write yet. I’ve tried, but the first set of ideas had too little potential to take me somewhere. The good thing is that I had a breakthrough in the main characters inner conflicts, witch gives me a stronger sense of a ‘controlling idea’, and it certainly makes it easier to write. Now, when I ask myself ‘what happens if the character was in this situation, what would he do?’ I have a better idea, because I know his innermost fears and thoughts.
I hope the structure of the story will be defined out from the character and the ‘controlling idea’. I love characters, and I think it’s the only way I can come up with a full concept. My ideas always starts with characters. Usually, writers do it the other way, they get their story structure first and finds fitting character types to act in their story. I don’t think it is the right way to go about it for me, because I think it can invite to creating flat characters that acts like puppets to express the story. My focus is different, but does that leave me to write a ‘flat’ story? Not necessarily.. I just think one can find more depth in a character than in the story itself.. Maybe story and character it’s the same thing.. I just felt that my last screenplay was pretty much character-driven, but burdened with a cheap story structure. I want it to come to me more naturally this time, and not so forced. I do want to have a interesting story to tell, but I guess it will have a more modernistic feel to it..
I’m sure that I will not write anything before I have it all sorted out. When I know the story structure, with the controlling idea and characters fully defined, I can start the writing of the synopsis and the outline.. And when I get to this point, the script will pretty much write itself. I can’t just write any scene without knowing what is gonna happen in all the other scenes. Those days are over.
My philosophy used to be similar to the ones of Sherlock Holmes. When Watson was lecturing Holmes about cosmology, he told him that he didn’t need to know about all that stuff to crack the case. When I was at the gymnasium, I just wanted to make films. We even applied for and created our own film course to make this happen. The only A’s I got back then was in these courses I had personal interest in. Now I see why this is wrong. I’ve found so many new interests, there is this big thirst for knowledge within, I want to learn about everything.. and I think this is what have changed me for the better, and it really helps with the writing, or ‘cracking the case’. I don’t get uninspired as long as I have a library card. One must constantly fill up the vacuum with new ideas to keep it going.
Here’s a quote that I love from Naked, my favorite Mike Leigh film, that underlines what I’m getting at..
Louise:
So what happened, were you bored in Manchester?
Johnny:
Was I bored? No, I wasn’t fuckin’ bored. I’m never bored. That’s the trouble with everybody - you’re all so bored. You’ve had nature explained to you and you’re bored with it, you’ve had the living body explained to you and you’re bored with it, you’ve had the universe explained to you and you’re bored with it, so now you want cheap thrills and, like, plenty of them, and it doesn’t matter how tawdry or vacuous they are as long as it’s new as long as it’s new as long as it flashes and fuckin’ bleeps in forty fuckin’ different colors. So whatever else you can say about me, I’m not fuckin’ bored.